Nowlan and Heap in their book, titled Reliability Centered Maintenance, consider RCM decisions basically about to answer these following three questions:
1. How does a failure occur?
2. What are its consequences?
3. What good can preventive maintenance do?
​
Focusing on those independent of specific products and designs, field data are collected to validate the following three major aspects to support decisions:
​
1. to validate understanding of failures
2. to validate assessment of a plan
3. to validate effectiveness of an action
1. to validate understanding of failures
Understanding of failures includes but not limited to:
​
1. coupling of different failure modes
2. nature of failures, i.e. random or wear-out
3. failure percentages in different categories and/or modes
2. to validate assessment of a plan
Assessment outcomes of a maintenance plan, for example, includes but not limited to:
​
1. risk ranking and task prioritization
2. cost estimation
3. spare parts determination
3. to validate effectiveness of an action
Effectiveness of a maintenance action, for example, includes but not limited to:
​
1. effectiveness of maintenance/corrective actions
2. effectiveness of a condition monitoring tool/system
3. confirmation/validation of root cause analysis results
4. comparison/benchmark of maintenance workmanship and quality
5. assessment of design modification and second-source parts suppliers